When finding the solution set of rational inequalities (of the form $ {x-3over x+2} geq 0 $ etc.) , why do we consider the "zeroes" of the expression.

So I’ve been taught to solve this as follows:

First,

$x-3 = 0 implies x = 3 quad and quad x+2not= 0 implies xnot=-2 ,text{(b/c, undefined)} $ are "points of interest".

Sketch a number line from $-∞$ to $+∞$, with the points of interest ($-2$ & $3$) labeled.

Then we check each region bound by those numbers to see if they’re positive/negative and label them as such.

The thing I’m confused by is why do we check those zeroes? What tells us that the signs don’t suddenly flip at some other random value? Can someone explain in detail this working, suggest a better method or point me to other resources which "prove" the things I’m talking about.

Mathematics Asked by Shaheer ziya on November 21, 2021

2 AnswersAs Peter Foreman stated in his comment (and taking into note my own comment), the inequalities $$frac{x-3}{x+2}ge0$$ and $$(x-3)(x+2)ge 0$$ are equivalent. It's vividly seen in the graph below:

The graph shows that $$operatorname{sgn}left(frac{x-3}{x+2}right)=operatorname{sgn}left((x-3)(x+2)right), x neq -2$$

Answered by VIVID on November 21, 2021

For instance, consider $$frac{x-a}{x-b} ge 0, agt b$$ For a fraction to be non-negative, we need the numerator and the denominator to have the same parity, or that the numerator be zero.

If both are positive, then $$x-age 0 implies xge a$$and $$x-b gt 0 implies xgt b hspace{1 cm} because x-bne 0$$ Taking the inetrsection of the two requirements, we get $$xge a hspace{2 cm} (mathbf 1)$$

If both are negative, then $$x-a lt 0 implies xlt a \ x-b lt 0 implies xlt b $$ This means $$xlt b hspace{2 cm} (mathbf 2)$$ Now, either of the two cases can happen, so we take the union of $(mathbf 1)$ and $(mathbf 2)$: $$xin(-infty, b) cup [a, infty) $$ To answer your question more directly, we consider the zeroes of each factor, because that’s precisely where the factor changes its sign.

Answered by Tavish on November 21, 2021

1 Asked on August 4, 2020 by w-mu

differential geometry geodesic riemannian geometry smooth manifolds

1 Asked on August 4, 2020 by hash-man

1 Asked on August 3, 2020 by ifn47

2 Asked on August 3, 2020 by 2132123

1 Asked on August 3, 2020 by user

calculus of variations euler lagrange equation functional analysis reference request

1 Asked on August 2, 2020

cyclotomic polynomials elementary number theory primality test prime numbers

1 Asked on July 31, 2020 by twentyyears

1 Asked on July 30, 2020 by pea-terzi

elementary number theory examples counterexamples prime numbers

2 Asked on July 28, 2020 by lucas

0 Asked on July 27, 2020 by strictly_increasing

numerical calculus numerical methods ordinary differential equations probability theory stochastic differential equations

1 Asked on July 27, 2020 by gulzar

2 Asked on July 26, 2020 by outlier

Get help from others!

Recent Answers

- zkutch on A is greater than B by 25% then by what percentage B is less than A?
- zkutch on Show continuity of partial derivatives of piece-wise function
- Harish Chandra Rajpoot on A is greater than B by 25% then by what percentage B is less than A?
- Dominique on A is greater than B by 25% then by what percentage B is less than A?
- Ethan Bolker on A is greater than B by 25% then by what percentage B is less than A?

Recent Questions

- A is greater than B by 25% then by what percentage B is less than A?
- Show continuity of partial derivatives of piece-wise function
- For any two positive operator $a,b$ with norm $<1$ there is a $c$ such that $a,bleq c$ and $|c|<1$. Does this hold for $|a|=|b|=1$?
- Why do we use odd ratios rather than using conditional probabillity?
- Proof of Stone Weierstrass Theorem from Hahn Banach

© 2021 InsideDarkWeb.com. All rights reserved.