# Deriving Birkhoff's Theorem

I am trying to derive Birkhoff’s theorem in GR as an exercise: a spherically symmetric gravitational field is static in the vacuum area. I managed to prove that $g_{00}$ is independent of $t$ in the vacuum, and that $g_{00}*g_{11}=f(t)$.

But the next question is: Show that you can get back to a Schwarzschild metric by a certain mathematical operation. I am thinking at a coordinate change (or variable change on $r$) to absorb the $t$ dependence of $g_{11}$, but I can’t see the right one. Does someone has a tip to share?

Physics Asked on November 21, 2021

The Birkhoff's Theorem in 3+1D is e.g. proven (at a physics level of rigor) in Ref. 1 and Ref. 2. (An elegant equivalent 1-page proof of Birkhoff's theorem is given in Refs. 3-4.) Imagine that we have managed to argue$$^1$$ that the metric is of the form of eq. (5.38) in Ref. 1 or eq. (7.13) in Ref. 2:

$$ds^2~=~-e^{2alpha(r,t)}dt^2 + e^{2beta(r,t)}dr^2 +r^2 dOmega^2. tag{A}$$

It is a straightforward exercise to calculate the corresponding Ricci tensor $$R_{munu}$$, see eq. (5.41) in Ref. 1 or eq. (7.16) in Ref. 2. The notation is here $$x^0equiv t, quad x^1equiv r, quad x^2equivtheta, quadtext{and} quad x^3equivphi.$$ The Einstein's equations in vacuum read

$$R_{munu}~=~Lambda g_{munu}~.tag{E}$$

The argument is now as follows.

1. From $$0~stackrel{(E)}{=}~R_{tr}~=~frac{2}{r}partial_tbeta$$ follows that $$beta$$ is independent of $$t$$.

2. From $$0~stackrel{(A)}{=}~Lambdaleft(e^{2(beta-alpha)} g_{tt}+g_{rr} right) ~stackrel{(E)}{=}~ e^{2(beta-alpha)} R_{tt}+R_{rr}~=~frac{2}{r}partial_r(alpha+beta)$$ follows that $$partial_r(alpha+beta)=0$$. In other words, the function $$f(t):=alpha+beta$$ is independent of $$r$$.

3. Define a new coordinate variable $$T:=int^t dt'~e^{f(t')}$$. Then the metric $$(A)$$ becomes $$ds^2~=~-e^{-2beta}dT^2 + e^{2beta}dr^2 +r^2 dOmega^2.tag{B}$$

4. Rename the new coordinate variable $$Tto t$$. Then eq. $$(B)$$ corresponds to setting $$alpha=-beta$$ in eq. $$(A)$$.

5. From $$Lambda r^2~stackrel{(B)}{=}~Lambda g_{thetatheta} ~stackrel{(E)}{=}~ R_{thetatheta} ~=~1+e^{-2beta}left(rpartial_r(beta-alpha)-1right) ~=~1-partial_r(re^{-2beta}),$$ it follows that $$re^{-2beta}~=~r-R-frac{Lambda}{3}r^3$$ for some real integration constant $$R$$. In other words, we have derived the Schwarzschild-(anti)de Sitter solution, $$e^{2alpha}~=~e^{-2beta}~=~1-frac{R}{r}-frac{Lambda}{3}r^2.$$

Finally, if we switch back to the original $$t$$ coordinate variable, the metric $$(A)$$ becomes

begin{align}ds^2~=~&-left(1-frac{R}{r}-frac{Lambda}{3}r^2right)e^{2f(t)}dt^2 cr &+ left(1-frac{R}{r}-frac{Lambda}{3}r^2right)^{-1}dr^2 +r^2 dOmega^2.end{align}tag{C}

It is interesting that the metric $$(C)$$ is the most general metric of the form $$(A)$$ that satisfies Einstein's vacuum equations. The only freedom is the function $$f=f(t)$$, which reflects the freedom to reparametrize the $$t$$ coordinate variable.

References:

1. Sean Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity, 2003.

2. Sean Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, Chapter 7. The pdf file is available here.

3. Eric Poisson, A Relativist's Toolkit, 2004; Section 5.1.1.

4. Eric Poisson, An Advanced course in GR; Section 5.1.1.

--

$$^1$$ Here we for convenience show how Ref. 1 and Ref. 2 reduce from
begin{align} ds^2~=~&g_{aa}(a,r)~da^2 +2g_{ar}(a,r)~ da~dr cr &+g_{rr}(a,r)~ dr^2 +r^2dOmega^2end{align} tag{5.30/7.5} to $$ds^2~=~m(r,t)~dt^2 +n(r,t)~dr^2 +r^2dOmega^2. tag{5.37/7.12}$$ Proof: Define a function $$n~:=~g_{rr}-frac{g_{ar}^2}{g_{aa}}$$ and an inexact differential $$omega~:=~da+frac{g_{ar}}{g_{aa}}dr.$$ Then eq. (5.30/7.5) reads $$ds^2~=~g_{aa}omega^2 +n~dr^2 +r^2dOmega^2.$$ The function $$sqrt{m}$$ in eq. (5.37/7.12) can be viewed as an integrating factor to make the differential $$sqrt{frac{g_{aa}}{m}}omega$$ exact, i.e. of the form $$dt$$ for some function $$t(a,r)$$.

Answered by Qmechanic on November 21, 2021

Are you doing this rigorously by using an ansatz for your metric and plugging it into the usual Einstein field equations in vacuum or something "more topological"?

If former, in the most common ansatz,

$ds^2 = e^{f(t,r)} dt^2 - e^{g(t,r)} dr^2 - r^2 dOmega^2$

you get your metric independence of time t with the

{01}th Ricci tensor component, which sets a time derivative of one of your metric components to 0. Algebraic combinations of the other Ricci tensor componentes give you the relationships between metric component functions $f$ and $g$, somewhere along the way you should get something like $frac{d}{dt}[f(t,r)-g(t,r)] = 0$. That gives you your time independance of $g_{11}$.

Answered by Thomas M. on November 21, 2021

## Related Questions

### Magnetic monopole, vector-potential and differential forms

0  Asked on February 18, 2021 by mr-mxyzptlk

### Magnetic moments of nucleons

1  Asked on February 18, 2021 by federico-mastellone

### Torque due to forces acting over a surface area

1  Asked on February 17, 2021

### Measurement of photon incident at an angle on detector

0  Asked on February 17, 2021

### What is the role of sound in string theory?

0  Asked on February 17, 2021 by botsina

### Are multiple images an exclusive propertiy of gravitational lenses?

1  Asked on February 17, 2021 by michkov

### Translation of coordinates to generalised coordinates

2  Asked on February 17, 2021

### Help me to envision a man falling towards a black hole with all of the time dilation involved

1  Asked on February 17, 2021

### What does a Hilbert space state vector represent in Koopman–von Neumann theory?

2  Asked on February 17, 2021

### Are there other theories than gravitational attraction taken into account as a reason for the extreme accumulation of matter in the universe?

1  Asked on February 17, 2021

### Why two vibrations of different frequencies and amplitudes need to be commensurable when the resultant vibration is formed from their superposition?

1  Asked on February 17, 2021 by chandan-gupta

### Law of conservation of energy and potential energy

2  Asked on February 17, 2021 by cattosphere

### Identify the Origin of each term in Weizsäcker’s Semi-Empirical Mass formula?

0  Asked on February 17, 2021

### Order parameter and Bose-Einstein condensation

1  Asked on February 17, 2021 by pooja

### Example when some force (work) transfers energy from one place to another (without converting energy from one form to another)?

1  Asked on February 17, 2021 by code-complete

### Why is the speed of light ignored in this formula?

1  Asked on February 17, 2021 by lordnoob

### Rate of Heat Loss of Plasma in Space

1  Asked on February 17, 2021 by zguy1217

### Elliptic orbits and why sun located at focal point acts like at the center of the ellipse?

1  Asked on February 17, 2021 by jalede-jaled

### Momentum operator on position eigenket

1  Asked on February 17, 2021 by snpr_physics